Skip to content
Prev 206486 / 398503 Next

Interpreting Poisson GLM coefficients into everyday language

On Jan 15, 2010, at 4:50 PM, Shawn Morrison wrote:

            
Assuming that -0.19 was an estimated coefficient in a glm  model  
specified with a formula of:
  Y ~  A + log(B+1) , then you most likely got a model fit with a log  
link (the default for Poisson models) in addition to the log transform  
you applied . So you may have unnecessarily used log transforms.

Then the expected value of Y|log(B+1)  for  E(Y|log(B+1)=1), would be  
exp(-0.19) times that of E(Y|log(B+1)=0). You may have confused things  
a bit by using log(B+1).

a) Did you have zero values for B?
b) Was there really a need to transform A and  B in that manner? You  
ended up with a log(log()) transform.

        
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Code. We want code.