Message-ID: <63254fa1-f644-6ed7-bbfe-9cf8b1000043@rgzm.de>
Date: 2022-03-10T07:56:36Z
From: Ivan Calandra
Subject: placeholder for native pipes
In-Reply-To: <59B09B36-DEFB-4BCF-AC38-E84E0AAAB703@dcn.davis.ca.us>
Dear Jeff,
Thank you for the hint. I had read about it. While it is quite useful, I
doubt that any of my colleagues would understand the construct...
Waiting for the placeholder :)
Best,
Ivan
--
Dr. Ivan Calandra
Imaging lab
RGZM - MONREPOS Archaeological Research Centre
Schloss Monrepos
56567 Neuwied, Germany
+49 (0) 2631 9772-243
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ivan_Calandra
On 09/03/2022 18:21, Jeff Newmiller wrote:
> Not currently, but you can emulate it with the anonymous function shorthand:
>
> (\(.) expression_using_dot ))()
>
> e.g. https://i.reddit.com/r/rstats/comments/nkiavh/is_base_r_pipe_faster_than_dplyr/
>
>
> On March 9, 2022 4:57:36 AM PST, Ivan Calandra <ivan.calandra at rgzm.de> wrote:
>> Dear useRs,
>>
>> When the implementation of the native pipe was announced (e.g.
>> https://www.r-bloggers.com/2021/05/the-new-r-pipe/), there was no
>> placeholder similar to the dot in magrittr.
>>
>> Has it changed? Is there now a placeholder? There is no mention of it in
>> the help page for "|>" so I guess not, but maybe someone on the list
>> knows more about future developments?
>>
>> Thank you!
>> Ivan
>>