Reply to list policy
"PDB" == Peter Dalgaard BSA <p.dalgaard at biostat.ku.dk> writes:
PDB> Martyn Plummer <plummer at iarc.fr> writes:
>> I wonder if it isn't time to change the reply-to-list policy of
>> R-help and adopt the alternative convention of replying to the
>> author and asking him/her to summarize to the list.
>>
>> Recently R-help has been too busy for me to keep up with.
>> There were quite a few identical responses in the "Finding
>> indices with a certain property" thread, rather than an
>> extended discussion. I think this illustrates the need for a
>> reply to author policy.
>>
>> Does anybody else feel the same way?
PDB> Not me.
Not me, either. Peter summarized my feelings precisely.
PDB> - people often don't get around to summarizing
PDB> - you don't see whether anyone else replied, so either people
PDB> get zero responses or responses from everyone. Todays minor
PDB> storm was an exception to that effect: people replying
PDB> before responses of others got in.
PDB> - it is manageable with filtering and
PDB> threading. (e.g. procmail or gnus)
A.J. Rossini Research Assistant Professor of Biostatistics Center for AIDS Research/HMC Biostatistics/Univ. of Washington Box 359931 Box 357232 206-731-3647 (3693=fax) 206-543-1044 (3286=fax) rossini at u.washington.edu rossini at biostat.washington.edu http://www.biostat.washington.edu/~rossini/ -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe" (in the "body", not the subject !) To: r-help-request at stat.math.ethz.ch _._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._