Skip to content
Prev 243962 / 398506 Next

HOW to use the survivalROC to get optimal cut-off values?

On Dec 5, 2010, at 11:14 AM, petretta at unina.it wrote:

            
Optimality specification requires some sort of valuation of incorrect  
decisions. If you are willing to defend a choice that a false positive  
has exactly the same loss as a false negative, which is generally not  
the case in medical decision-making,  then the point on the ROC curve  
which is closest to the upper left-hand corner is "optimal".

Having only 5 values is getting pretty close to violating the  
presumption of ROC analysis that the result be at least pseudo- 
continuous. I have see quite a few "ROC curves in this situation that  
do not have a clear winner ( now assuming equal cost for FP and FN  
which I already said was usually a faulty assumption)  because the  
closest point on the curve was in the middle of the line segment  
between two of the points. I'm not sure that the typical practice of  
plotting ROC curves with slanting line segments is valid. There is no  
information between those discrete points. You should probably be  
using a table rather than a curve in this situation.
David Winsemius, MD
West Hartford, CT