Skip to content
Prev 257315 / 398506 Next

Is there a better way to parse strings than this?

Chris Howden 
Thanks for the explanation,

I think I understand it now. So to paraphrase all your explanations

To match "." in a regular expression then the string "\.\.\." needs to be
passed to it. This tells it to escape the special meaning of ".". But in
order to get the \ into the string being passed to the function I also
need to escape its special meaning, so I need to use "\\.\\.\\."



Chris Howden
Founding Partner
Tricky Solutions
Tricky Solutions 4 Tricky Problems
Evidence Based Strategic Development, IP Commercialisation and Innovation,
Data Analysis, Modelling and Training
(mobile) 0410 689 945
(fax / office) (+618) 8952 7878
chris at trickysolutions.com.au


-----Original Message-----
From: h.wickham at gmail.com [mailto:h.wickham at gmail.com] On Behalf Of Hadley
Wickham
Sent: Friday, 15 April 2011 11:07 AM
To: Chris Howden
Cc: r-help at r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R] Is there a better way to parse strings than this?
than
Basically,

 * you want to match .
 * so the regular expression you need is \.
 * and the way you represent that in a string in R is \\.

Hadley

Thread (9 messages)

Chris Howden Is there a better way to parse strings than this? Apr 12 Dennis Murphy Is there a better way to parse strings than this? Apr 13 Hadley Wickham Is there a better way to parse strings than this? Apr 13 Gabor Grothendieck Is there a better way to parse strings than this? Apr 13 Chris Howden Is there a better way to parse strings than this? Apr 14 Hadley Wickham Is there a better way to parse strings than this? Apr 14 Gabor Grothendieck Is there a better way to parse strings than this? Apr 14 Whit Armstrong Is there a better way to parse strings than this? Apr 14 Chris Howden Is there a better way to parse strings than this? Apr 18