convergence error code in mixed effects models
Hi Ilona,
Is there a solution for this problem?
If there is, then Professor Bates (the gentleman who replied to your question) will have tried to find it, and fix it, for you. Professor Bates wrote/co-wrote the software package (nlme) you are using. And while I have nothing against Crawley's book, you are usually much better off going to primary sources first, to solve this kind of problem (which, of course you have done, though may not have been aware of it ;) Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS, by: Pinheiro, Jos?, Bates, Douglas http://www.springer.com/west/home/statistics/computational?SGWID=4-10130-22-2102822-0 Hope this speeds you on your way... Regards, Mark.
Ilona Leyer wrote:
Here an simple example: rep treat heightfra leaffra leafvim week ID1 pHf 1.54 4 4 4 ID2 pHf 1.49 4 4 4 ID3 pHf 1.57 4 5 4 ID4 pHf 1.48 4 4 4 ID5 pHf 1.57 4 4 4 ID6 pHs 1.29 4 5 4 ID7 pHs 0.97 4 5 4 ID8 pHs 2.06 4 4 4 ID9 pHs 0.88 4 4 4 ID10 pHs 1.47 4 4 4 ID1 pHf 3.53 5 6 6 ID2 pHf 4.08 6 6 6 ID3 pHf 3.89 6 6 6 ID4 pHf 3.78 5 6 6 ID5 pHf 3.92 6 6 6 ID6 pHs 2.76 5 5 6 ID7 pHs 3.31 6 7 6 ID8 pHs 4.46 6 7 6 ID9 pHs 2.19 5 5 6 ID10 pHs 3.83 5 5 6 ID1 pHf 5.07 7 7 9 ID2 pHf 6.42 7 8 9 ID3 pHf 5.43 6 8 9 ID4 pHf 6.83 6 8 9 ID5 pHf 6.26 6 8 9 ID6 pHs 4.57 6 9 9 ID7 pHs 5.05 6 7 9 ID8 pHs 6.27 6 8 9 ID9 pHs 3.37 5 7 9 ID10 pHs 5.38 6 8 9 ID1 pHf 5.58 7 9 12 ID2 pHf 7.43 8 9 12 ID3 pHf 6.18 8 10 12 ID4 pHf 6.91 7 10 12 ID5 pHf 6.78 7 10 12 ID6 pHs 4.99 6 13 12 ID7 pHs 5.50 7 8 12 ID8 pHs 6.56 7 10 12 ID9 pHs 3.72 6 10 12 ID10 pHs 5.94 6 10 12 I used the procedure described in Crawley?s new R Book. For two of the tree response variables (heightfra,leaffra) it doesn?t work, while it worked with leafvim (but in another R session, yesterday, leaffra worked as well...). Here the commands:
attach(test) names(test)
[1] "week" "rep" "treat" "heightfra" "leaffra" "leafvim"
library(nlme)
test<-groupedData(heightfra~week|rep,outer=~treat,test)
model1<-lme(heightfra~treat,random=~week|rep)
Error in lme.formula(heightfra ~ treat, random = ~week
| rep) :
nlminb problem, convergence error code = 1;
message = iteration limit reached without convergence
(9)
test<-groupedData(leaffra~week|rep,outer=~treat,test)
model2<-lme(leaffra~treat,random=~week|rep)
Error in lme.formula(leaffra ~ treat, random = ~week |
rep) :
nlminb problem, convergence error code = 1;
message = iteration limit reached without convergence
(9)
test<-groupedData(leafvim~week|rep,outer=~treat,test)
model3<-lme(leafvim~treat,random=~week|rep) summary(model)
Error in summary(model) : object "model" not found
summary(model3)
Linear mixed-effects model fit by REML
Data: NULL
AIC BIC logLik
129.6743 139.4999 -58.83717
Random effects:
Formula: ~week | rep
Structure: General positive-definite, Log-Cholesky
parametrization
StdDev Corr
(Intercept) 4.4110478 (Intr)
week 0.7057311 -0.999
Residual 0.5976143
Fixed effects: leafvim ~ treat
Value Std.Error DF t-value p-value
(Intercept) 5.924659 0.1653596 30 35.82893 0.0000
treatpHs 0.063704 0.2338538 8 0.27241 0.7922
Correlation:
(Intr)
treatpHs -0.707
Standardized Within-Group Residuals:
Min Q1 Med Q3
Max
-1.34714254 -0.53042878 -0.01769195 0.40644540
2.29301560
Number of Observations: 40
Number of Groups: 10
Is there a solution for this problem?
Thanks!!!
Ilona
--- Douglas Bates <bates at stat.wisc.edu> schrieb:
On Dec 13, 2007 4:15 PM, Ilona Leyer <ileyer at yahoo.de> wrote:
Dear All, I want to analyse treatment effects with time
series
data: I measured e.g. leaf number (five replicate plants) in relation to two soil pH - after 2,4,6,8 weeks. I used mixed effects models, but some
analyses
didn?t work. It seems for me as if this is a
randomly
occurring problem since sometimes the same model
works
sometimes not. An example:
names(test)
[1] "rep" "treat" "leaf" "week"
library (lattice) library (nlme)
test<-groupedData(leaf~week|rep,outer=~treat,test)
model<-lme(leaf~treat,random=~leaf|rep)
Error in lme.formula(leaf~ treat, random =
~week|rep) Really!? You gave lme a model with random = ~ leaf | rep (and no data specification) and it tried to fit a model with random = ~ week | rep? Are you sure that is an exact transcript?
:
nlminb problem, convergence error code =
1;
message = iteration limit reached without
convergence
(9)
Has anybody an idea to solve this problem?
Oh, I have lots of ideas but without a reproducible example I can't hope to decide what might be the problem. It appears that the model may be over-parameterized. Assuming that there are 4 different values of week then ~ week | rep requires fitting 10 variance-covariance parameters. That's a lot. The error code indicates that the optimizer is taking
______________________________________________ R-help at r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/convergence-error-code-in-mixed-effects-models-tp14325990p14340592.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.