Skip to content
Prev 58660 / 398502 Next

survSplit

On Mon, 8 Nov 2004, Danardono wrote:

            
This should NOT be the same, and on my computer is not.  You should have 
to use the counting-process syntax.  I get
Call:
coxph(formula = Surv(time, status) ~ x, data = aml3)


                coef exp(coef) se(coef)    z     p
xNonmaintained 1.07      2.92    0.514 2.08 0.037

Likelihood ratio test=4.61  on 1 df, p=0.0317  n= 63
Call:
coxph(formula = Surv(start, time, status) ~ x, data = aml3)


                 coef exp(coef) se(coef)    z     p
xNonmaintained 0.916       2.5    0.512 1.79 0.074

Likelihood ratio test=3.38  on 1 df, p=0.0658  n= 63
Hmm.  I suspect this is a <= vs < bug of some sort in handling start 
times.

 	-thomas