Skip to content
Prev 326490 / 398502 Next

(lme4) p-values for single terms in mixed models involved in sig interactions

sarah hoffmann <s.hoffmann85 <at> outlook.com> writes:
There are a variety of issues involved here, and most of  them are
not lme4-related.  In fact, you'll have an even bigger problem with
lme4 since by default it doesn't give p-values at all (see
http://glmm.wikidot.com/faq for a description of why not, and some
things you can do about that).

 * stepwards backwards deletion is almost always a bad idea
(see e.g. Harrell _Regression Modeling Strategies_ 2001, or google
'"stepwise regression" problems')

* violating marginality (i.e. testing the significance of main effects
in the presence of an interaction containing the main effect) is
almost always a bad idea: e.g. google "Venables exegesis". There are
_very_ occasionally reasons you would want to consider a model with
an interaction term but with one of the main effects missing/removed (e.g.
if you know based on an experimental design that all the treatments
in an experiment start at the same time, you might want to set the
intercepts the same, which would give you (time + treatment:time).
It's hard to specify this case for two categorical variables; you
pretty much have to construct the dummy variables yourself.

  Ben Bolker