R in the NY Times
On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 08:00:28AM -0600, Frank E Harrell Jr wrote:
This is great to see. It's interesting that SAS Institute feels that non-peer-reviewed software with hidden implementations of analytic methods that cannot be reproduced by others should be trusted when building aircraft engines. Frank
Unfortunately, that type of FUD issued by the SAS marketing person still works. I see it at my employer (a large healthcare company.) It's a battle to change a culture, but ironically the recession helps. People are now taking notice of the obscene licensing fees for SAS. Darin