I think you misunderstood my explantation.

arun

Wed, Jan 30, 2013 3:53 AM

Hi,

Your dataset had already some missing values.? So, I need to subset only those rows that are not missing.
!is.na(temp$ACTIVE_KWH)
# [1]? TRUE? TRUE? TRUE FALSE? TRUE FALSE FALSE? TRUE? TRUE? TRUE? TRUE FALSE
#[13]? TRUE? TRUE? TRUE
temp$ACTIVE_KWH[!is.na(temp$ACTIVE_KWH)]
#[1] 1201.9 1202.2 1202.8 1203.9?? 12.0 1206.0 1206.3 1206.5 1207.3 1207.9
#[11] 1208.4

?diff() will get the differences between successive values
diff(temp$ACTIVE_KWH[!is.na(temp$ACTIVE_KWH)])
?#[1]???? 0.3???? 0.6???? 1.1 -1191.9? 1194.0???? 0.3???? 0.2???? 0.8???? 0.6
#[10]???? 0.5

#Here, the length is 1 less than the previous case as the first value is removed.
?diff(temp$ACTIVE_KWH[!is.na(temp$ACTIVE_KWH)])<0
# [1] FALSE FALSE FALSE? TRUE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE

#Added `FALSE` at the beginning to make the length equal to subset data
indx<- c(FALSE,diff(temp$ACTIVE_KWH[!is.na(temp$ACTIVE_KWH)])<0)
indx 
#[1] FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE? TRUE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE

#Using this index, further subset the already subset data for differences of values <0
?temp$ACTIVE_KWH[!is.na(temp$ACTIVE_KWH)][indx]
#[1] 12
temp$ACTIVE_KWH[!is.na(temp$ACTIVE_KWH)][indx]<- NA #changed to NA

#Similarly for REACTIVE_KWH
Hope this helps.
A.K.

From: ??? <jamansymptom at naver.com>
To: arun <smartpink111 at yahoo.com>
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2013 12:51 AM
Subject: Re: I think you misunderstood my explantation.

Oh, I forgot to ask about those code.
Can u expain what dose that mean?

Using the first dataset temp:
temp$ACTIVE_KWH[!is.na(temp$ACTIVE_KWH)][c(FALSE,diff(temp$ACTIVE_KWH[!is.na(temp$ACTIVE_KWH)])< 0)]<-NA
temp$REACTIVE_KWH[!is.na(temp$REACTIVE_KWH)][c(FALSE,diff(temp$REACTIVE_KWH[!is.na(temp$REACTIVE_KWH)])< 0)]<-NA?
-----Original Message-----
From: "arun"<smartpink111 at yahoo.com> 
To: "???"<jamansymptom at naver.com>; 
Cc: "R help"<r-help at r-project.org>; 
Sent: 2013-01-30 (?) 10:37:18
Subject: Re: I think you misunderstood my explantation.

Hi,
Sorry, I didn't check your codes previously.

I hope this works for you (especially the <0).
Using the first dataset temp:
temp$ACTIVE_KWH[!is.na(temp$ACTIVE_KWH)][c(FALSE,diff(temp$ACTIVE_KWH[!is.na(temp$ACTIVE_KWH)])< 0)]<-NA
temp$REACTIVE_KWH[!is.na(temp$REACTIVE_KWH)][c(FALSE,diff(temp$REACTIVE_KWH[!is.na(temp$REACTIVE_KWH)])< 0)]<-NA
temp
#????? ID??????? CTIME ACTIVE_KWH REACTIVE_KWH
#1? HM001 201212121301???? 1201.9?????? 1115.5
#2? HM001 201212121302???? 1202.2?????? 1115.8
#3? HM001 201212121303???? 1202.8?????? 1115.8
#4? HM001 201212121304???????? NA?????? 1116.1
#5? HM001 201212121305???? 1203.9?????? 1116.7
#6? HM001 201212121306???????? NA?????? 1116.7
#7? HM001 201212121307???????? NA?????? 1116.7
#8? HM001 201212121308???????? NA?????????? NA
#9? HM001 201212121309???? 1206.0?????? 1118.2
#10 HM001 201212121310???? 1206.3?????? 1118.6
#11 HM001 201212121311???? 1206.5?????? 1118.8
#12 HM001 201212121312???????? NA?????????? NA
#13 HM001 201212121313???? 1207.3?????????? NA
#14 HM001 201212121314???? 1207.9?????? 1121.1
#15 HM001 201212121315???? 1208.4?????? 1121.3
temp1$ACTIVE_KWH[!is.na(temp1$ACTIVE_KWH)][c(FALSE,diff(temp1$ACTIVE_KWH[!is.na(temp1$ACTIVE_KWH)])< 0)]<-NA

#Similarly with the second dataset:
temp1$ACTIVE_KWH[!is.na(temp1$ACTIVE_KWH)][c(FALSE,diff(temp1$ACTIVE_KWH[!is.na(temp1$ACTIVE_KWH)])< 0)]<-NA
temp1$REACTIVE_KWH[!is.na(temp1$REACTIVE_KWH)][c(FALSE,diff(temp1$REACTIVE_KWH[!is.na(temp1$REACTIVE_KWH)])< 0)]<-NA


A.K.






________________________________
From: ??? <jamansymptom>@naver.com>
To: arun <smartpink111>@yahoo.com> 
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2013 7:42 PM
Subject: I think you misunderstood my explantation.


Hi,

Assume that first CTIME value is '201201010000'. It means?ACTIVE_KWH?measured from??'201201010000' to present.
show example below row.

1? HM001 201212121301 1201.9 1115.5

1 row's? ACTIVE_KWH?? accumulated?value that measured from '201201010000' to '201212121301'.
when CTIME is '201212121301',??ACTIVE_KWH? is '1201.9'.? And, when? CTIME is? '201212121302', ACTIVE_KWH? is?'1202.2'.
It?means that?0.3 is measured?during 1 minute.? And??ACTIVE_KWH? is a accumulated value.
Thus, ACTIVE_KWH? must increase, as CTIME? increases.
You got it?? So, I have to define strange value?as subtraction?value like (?temp$ACTIVE_KWH[i] -??temp$ACTIVE_KWH[i-1]) > 50). '50' can be chagned.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> for(i in 2:m){
?temp$ACTIVE_KWH[i]<- ifelse(temp$ACTIVE_KWH[i]- temp$ACTIVE_KWH[i-1]<0,NA, temp$ACTIVE_KWH[i])
}
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But, in this case, ?critical error occured.?If??temp$ACTIVE_KWH[3]?is NA, posterior data (temp$ACTIVE_KWH[4], [5], [6]...) ?is imputed as NA.
Last mail contains Detailed source code and result. 
Can you recommend better idea to avoid imputed dataset as a successive NA. 
-----Original Message-----
From: "arun"<smartpink111>@yahoo.com> 
To: "???"<jamansymptom>@naver.com>; 
Cc: "R help"<r-help>@r-project.org>; 
Sent: 2013-01-29 (?) 23:28:30
Subject: Re: I succeed to get result dataset.

HI,

temp<-read.table(text="
?ID??????? CTIME?? ACTIVE_KWH REACTIVE_KWH
1? HM001 201212121301 1201.9 1115.5
2? HM001 201212121302 1202.2 1115.8
3? HM001 201212121303 1202.8 1115.8
4? HM001 201212121304???? NA 1116.1
5? HM001 201212121305 1203.9 1116.7
6? HM001 201212121306???? NA 1116.7
7? HM001 201212121307???? NA 1116.7
8? HM001 201212121308?? 12.0?? 31.0
9? HM001 201212121309 1206.0 1118.2
10 HM001 201212121310 1206.3 1118.6
11 HM001 201212121311 1206.5 1118.8
12 HM001 201212121312???? NA???? NA
13 HM001 201212121313 1207.3???? NA
14 HM001 201212121314 1207.9 1121.1
15 HM001 201212121315 1208.4 1121.3
",sep="",header=TRUE,stringsAsFactors=F)

#Here, I assume that you consider <1000 as low values, You can change it accordingly.
?temp[,3:4][temp[,3]<1000& !is.na(temp[,3]),]<-NA
?temp
#????? ID??????? CTIME ACTIVE_KWH REACTIVE_KWH
#1? HM001 201212121301???? 1201.9?????? 1115.5
#2? HM001 201212121302???? 1202.2?????? 1115.8
#3? HM001 201212121303???? 1202.8?????? 1115.8
#4? HM001 201212121304???????? NA?????? 1116.1
#5? HM001 201212121305???? 1203.9?????? 1116.7
#6? HM001 201212121306???????? NA?????? 1116.7
#7? HM001 201212121307???????? NA?????? 1116.7
#8? HM001 201212121308???????? NA?????????? NA
#9? HM001 201212121309???? 1206.0?????? 1118.2
#10 HM001 201212121310???? 1206.3?????? 1118.6
#11 HM001 201212121311???? 1206.5?????? 1118.8
#12 HM001 201212121312???????? NA?????????? NA
#13 HM001 201212121313???? 1207.3?????????? NA
#14 HM001 201212121314???? 1207.9?????? 1121.1
#15 HM001 201212121315???? 1208.4?????? 1121.3


#Suppose your dataset is like this:
temp1<-read.table(text="
?ID??????? CTIME?? ACTIVE_KWH REACTIVE_KWH
1? HM001 201212121301 1201.9 1115.5
2? HM001 201212121302 1202.2 1115.8
3? HM001 201212121303 1202.8 1115.8
4? HM001 201212121304???? NA 1116.1
5? HM001 201212121305 1203.9 1116.7
6? HM001 201212121306???? NA 1116.7
7? HM001 201212121307???? NA 1116.7
8? HM001 201212121308?? 12.0?? 31.0
9? HM001 201212121309 1206.0 1118.2
10 HM001 201212121310 21.0 1118.6
11 HM001 201212121311 1206.5 1118.8
12 HM001 201212121312???? NA???? NA
13 HM001 201212121313 1207.3???? NA
14 HM001 201212121314 1207.9 1121.1
15 HM001 201212121315 1208.4 22.0
",sep="",header=TRUE,stringsAsFactors=F)
temp1[,3][temp1[,3]<1000&!is.na(temp[,3])]<-NA
?temp1[,4][temp1[,4]<1000&!is.na(temp[,4])]<-NA

Hope it helps.

A.K.






________________________________
From: ??? <jamansymptom>@naver.com>
To: arun <smartpink111>@yahoo.com> 
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2013 3:36 AM
Subject: Re: I succeed to get result dataset.


Arun ~ I have a dfficuliting in using R again. 
A?Dataset?'temp'?contatins NA and strange value(like 8 row 12.0, 31.0 which is out of range of value).

**What I want is to set strange value as NA.**? 
Then I'll impute dataset 'temp' by myself.
Since, It is impossible to be little for 'WIDTH' and 'HEIGHT', 
I?define a procdeure like below. 
> for(i in 2:m){
?ex$WIDTH[i]<- ifelse(ex$WIDTH [i]- ex$WIDTH [i-1]<0,NA, ex$WIDTH [i])
?ex$HEIGHT[i]<- ifelse(ex$HEIGHT[i]- ex$HEIGHT [i-1]<0,NA, ex$HEIGHT [i])
}

But result is wrong.?Do u have better idea to define procedure performing well?

`There is a dataset named 'temp'.

????? ID??????? CTIME?? ACTIVE_KWH REACTIVE_KWH

1? HM001 201212121301 1201.9 1115.5

2? HM001 201212121302 1202.2 1115.8

3? HM001 201212121303 1202.8 1115.8

4? HM001 201212121304???? NA 1116.1

5? HM001 201212121305 1203.9 1116.7

6? HM001 201212121306???? NA 1116.7

7? HM001 201212121307???? NA 1116.7

8? HM001 201212121308?? 12.0?? 31.0

9? HM001 201212121309 1206.0 1118.2

10 HM001 201212121310 1206.3 1118.6

11 HM001 201212121311 1206.5 1118.8

12 HM001 201212121312???? NA???? NA

13 HM001 201212121313 1207.3???? NA

14 HM001 201212121314 1207.9 1121.1

15 HM001 201212121315 1208.4 1121.3

> m<- 15
> for(i in 2:m){temp$ACTIVE_KWH[i]<- ifelse(temp$ ACTIVE_KWH [i]- temp$ACTIVE_KWH[i-1]<0,NA, temp$ ACTIVE_KWH [i])
temp$REACTIVE_KWH[i]<- ifelse(temp$ REACTIVE_KWH [i]- temp$REACTIVE_KWH[i-1]<0,NA, temp$ REACTIVE_KWH [i])
}

**result of for statement** 

?? ID??????? CTIME ACTIVE_KWH REACTIVE_KWH

1? HM001 201212121301???? 1201.9?????? 1115.5

2? HM001 201212121302???? 1202.2?????? 1115.8

3? HM001 201212121303???? 1202.8?????? 1115.8

4? HM001 201212121304???????? NA?????? 1116.1

5? HM001 201212121305???????? NA?????? 1116.7

6 ?HM001 201212121306???????? NA?????? 1116.7

7? HM001 201212121307???????? NA?????? 1116.7

8? HM001 201212121308???????? NA?????????? NA

9? HM001 201212121309???????? NA?????????? NA

10 HM001 201212121310???????? NA?????????? NA

11 HM001 201212121311???????? NA?????????? NA

12 HM001 201212121312???????? NA?????????? NA

13 HM001 201212121313???????? NA?????????? NA

14 HM001 201212121314???????? NA?????????? NA

15 HM001 201212121315???????? NA?????????? NA

**What I expect (row8 WIDTH=NA, HEIGHT=NA)**? 
ID??????? CTIME? WIDTH HEIGHT

1? HM001 201212121301 1201.9 1115.5

2? HM001 201212121302 1202.2 1115.8

3? HM001 201212121303 1202.8 1115.8

4? HM001 201212121304???? NA 1116.1

5? HM001 201212121305 1203.9 1116.7

6? HM001 201212121306???? NA 1116.7

7? HM001 201212121307???? NA 1116.7

8? HM001 201212121308???? NA???? NA

9? HM001 201212121309 1206.0 1118.2

10 HM001 201212121310 1206.3 1118.6

11 HM001 201212121311 1206.5 1118.8

12 HM001 201212121312???? NA???? NA

13 HM001 201212121313 1207.3???? NA

14 HM001 201212121314 1207.9 1121.1

15 HM001 201212121315 1208.4 1121.3
-----Original Message-----
From: "arun"<smartpink111>@yahoo.com> 
To: "???"<jamansymptom>@naver.com>; 
Cc: 
Sent: 2013-01-29 (?) 15:23:56
Subject: Re: I succeed to get result dataset.

HI,

I am glad that it got fixed.

You can ask for help.
Thank you for the kind words.
Good night!
Arun?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????