Message-ID: <CAM9Qe4gp4xG9uKx8L1sANHXhuR-AHttHEQVpn8fVME-boXY3AQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: 2019-02-25T17:39:34Z
From: greg holly
Subject: differences between meat and metafor packages
Hi all;
I have got different results (CI and Q value for heterogeneity, tau) on the
same data when I run meta and metafor for hazard ratio with a random
effects model. The basic programs for both are given below. What can cause?
Regards,
Greg
Metafor
res <- rma(HR, SE, data=a)
predict(res, transf=exp)
Meta
metagen(HR, SE, sm="HR", data=a)
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]