WMF on Unix
On Mon, 15 Jan 2001, Peter Kleiweg wrote:
Prof Brian Ripley skriver...
It seems to me that an unreliable WMF writer is worse than none. In essence we have that problem on R for Windows now: the metafiles written there are in the wrong resolution (and I do know why) and hence are misinterpreted. However, when I try to write them in the right resolution, they are interpreted worse by Word, but correctly by another viewer!
Asuming WMF is the same as Windows Metafile, GSview seems to have solved the trick. Why not let GSview deal with it. Why bother recreating what's already available and working fine. Perhaps all that's needed is a little documentation on how to best export graphics from R to Word using GSview.
GSView, I believe, is no longer free. -- znmeb at teleport.com (M. Edward Borasky) http://www.teleport.com/~znmeb If God had meant carrots to be eaten cooked, He would have given rabbits fire. -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe" (in the "body", not the subject !) To: r-help-request at stat.math.ethz.ch _._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._