Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10101151936260.7618-100000@user2.teleport.com>
Date: 2001-01-16T03:37:40Z
From: M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
Subject: WMF on Unix
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0101152212250.612-100000@kleigh.nl>
On Mon, 15 Jan 2001, Peter Kleiweg wrote:
> Prof Brian Ripley skriver...
>
> > It seems to me that an unreliable WMF writer is worse than none.
> > In essence we have that problem on R for Windows now: the metafiles
> > written there are in the wrong resolution (and I do know why) and hence
> > are misinterpreted. However, when I try to write them in the
> > right resolution, they are interpreted worse by Word, but correctly
> > by another viewer!
>
> Asuming WMF is the same as Windows Metafile, GSview seems to
> have solved the trick. Why not let GSview deal with it. Why
> bother recreating what's already available and working fine.
> Perhaps all that's needed is a little documentation on how to
> best export graphics from R to Word using GSview.
GSView, I believe, is no longer free.
--
znmeb at teleport.com (M. Edward Borasky) http://www.teleport.com/~znmeb
If God had meant carrots to be eaten cooked, He would have given rabbits
fire.
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !) To: r-help-request at stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._