Sent from my phone. Please excuse my brevity.
On February 24, 2017 5:27:07 PM PST, C W <tmrsg11 at gmail.com> wrote:
>In theory, I am generating from group 5 groups of random numbers, each
>group has 3 samples.
>
>Isn't apply() the replacement of loops?
>
>On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 8:23 PM, Jeff Newmiller
><jdnewmil at dcn.davis.ca.us>
>wrote:
>
>> What is wrong with
>>
>> dat <- matrix(rnorm(15), nrow=5, ncol = 3)
>>
>> ?
>>
>> And what is this "no loop drama" you refer to? I use loops frequently
>to
>> loop around large memory gobbling chunks of code.
>>
>> --
>> Sent from my phone. Please excuse my brevity.
>>
>> On February 24, 2017 5:02:46 PM PST, C W <tmrsg11 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >Dear R,
>> >
>> >I wanted to simulate a 5 by 3 matrix which fills up by either rows
>or
>> >columns?
>> >
>> >I started with the following filling the matrix by rows,
>> >
>> >dat <- matrix(NA, nrow=5, ncol = 3)
>> >
>> >for(i in 1:5){
>> >
>> > dat[i, ] <- rnorm(3)
>> >
>> >}
>> >
>> >But, R is known for no loop drama. Any suggestions?
>> >
>> >Thanks!
>> >
>> > [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>> >
>> >______________________________________________
>> >R-help at r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
>> >https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
>> >PLEASE do read the posting guide
>> >http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
>> >and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
>>