Raw Message

Message-ID: <loom.20081231T094056-247@post.gmane.org>
Date: 2008-12-31T09:41:32Z
From: Dieter Menne
Subject: WinBUGS posterior samples (via R2WinBUGS)?

Uwe Ligges <ligges <at> statistik.tu-dortmund.de> writes:

> 3. I do prefer BRugs, the R package that is based on OpenBUGS, because 
> it is closer to BUGS, more flexible, sometimes easier to debug, ....

Which I strongly second, not only because of the author.

Dieter