Skip to content
Prev 140962 / 398498 Next

Thinking about using two y-scales on your plot?

Richie,
A plot of the actual temperature during a year (or thousands of years, 
as people in palaeoclimate-studies are rather used to) is just so much 
more intuitive, than some correlation-coefficients or such. I know I'm 
largely speaking to statisticians in this forum, but in Earth Sciences, 
most people aren't... I see the use of correlation coefficients and 
-plots in proofing that an apparent correlation is "real", but the first 
question upon presenting any statistic analysis is always "What does the 
DATA look like?".

Of course, these plots could be plotted separately with a common x-axis, 
it's just a matter of saving space and of being used to that kind of 
graph. I can't imagine anyone being falsely lead to a thought like "oh 
gosh, the temperature is much higher/bigger/more than the 
precipitation!" - that makes no sense. I do see the point in graphs 
where values are plotted together, whose possible interaction with each 
other might lead to wrong conclusions. Then, it might not be obvious 
that one is drawing a senseless conclusion.

Best regards,
Martin
Richard Cotton wrote: