R-beta: R-0.61.3 and __setfpucw.

Goran Brostrom <gb at stat.umu.se> writes:

Is __sparc__ automatically defined? In sparc/fpu_control.h there
is a line

extern void __setfpucw __P ((unsigned short));

but __setfpucw doesn't seem to be defined somewhere. I don't 
understand the significance of all this, but maybe it doesn't
matter?

Did you use something like an NFS mount of a file system to share the
same sources between the two machines?  If you did the configuration
on the Linux machine and kept around a config.cache file, it may have
used some information from the Linux machine in configuring the
compilation for the SPARC.  I would advise trying the
configure/compile sequence again on the SPARC but using a clean set of
source files direct from the .tar.gz archive.

Actually, the two compiles were done completely independent of each
other, as you propose. Each machine had its own copy of the source tree.

Goran
---------------------------------------------------------
Goran Brostrom
Department of Statistics              tel: +46 90 786-5223
Umea University                       fax: +46 90 786-6614
S-90187 Umea, Sweden               e-mail: gb at stat.umu.se
----------------------------------------------------------

-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !)  To: r-help-request at stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._