Sent from my phone. Please excuse my brevity.
On February 24, 2017 5:55:15 PM PST, C W <tmrsg11 at gmail.com> wrote:
>I suppose for loop will suffice.
>
>I simply copy & paste the code from R editor. From my email, it looks
>plain. Is there a way to tell?
>
>On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 8:50 PM, Jeff Newmiller
><jdnewmil at dcn.davis.ca.us>
>wrote:
>
>> The apply function is one of many alienate ways to write a loop. It
>is not
>> appreciably more efficient in cpu time than a for loop.
>>
>> Your example creates the numbers in the loop... does your actual data
>get
>> created in a loop? If so then your original code should be perfectly
>> serviceable. If not then there might be a better way to do this, but
>you
>> would have to expand your example to illustrate how the data comes to
>you
>> in order to suggest alternatives.
>>
>> Also post using plain text to prevent your code from being mangled on
>its
>> way to us.
>> --
>> Sent from my phone. Please excuse my brevity.
>>
>> On February 24, 2017 5:27:07 PM PST, C W <tmrsg11 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >In theory, I am generating from group 5 groups of random numbers,
>each
>> >group has 3 samples.
>> >
>> >Isn't apply() the replacement of loops?
>> >
>> >On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 8:23 PM, Jeff Newmiller
>> ><jdnewmil at dcn.davis.ca.us>
>> >wrote:
>> >
>> >> What is wrong with
>> >>
>> >> dat <- matrix(rnorm(15), nrow=5, ncol = 3)
>> >>
>> >> ?
>> >>
>> >> And what is this "no loop drama" you refer to? I use loops
>frequently
>> >to
>> >> loop around large memory gobbling chunks of code.
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Sent from my phone. Please excuse my brevity.
>> >>
>> >> On February 24, 2017 5:02:46 PM PST, C W <tmrsg11 at gmail.com>
>wrote:
>> >> >Dear R,
>> >> >
>> >> >I wanted to simulate a 5 by 3 matrix which fills up by either
>rows
>> >or
>> >> >columns?
>> >> >
>> >> >I started with the following filling the matrix by rows,
>> >> >
>> >> >dat <- matrix(NA, nrow=5, ncol = 3)
>> >> >
>> >> >for(i in 1:5){
>> >> >
>> >> > dat[i, ] <- rnorm(3)
>> >> >
>> >> >}
>> >> >
>> >> >But, R is known for no loop drama. Any suggestions?
>> >> >
>> >> >Thanks!
>> >> >
>> >> > [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>> >> >
>> >> >______________________________________________
>> >> >R-help at r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
>> >> >https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
>> >> >PLEASE do read the posting guide
>> >> >http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
>> >> >and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible
>code.
>> >>
>>