Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2006 17:08:27 -0500
From: "Doran, Harold" <HDoran at air.org>
Sender: r-help-bounces at stat.math.ethz.ch
Precedence: list
Thread-topic: Comparing posterior and likelihood estimates for proportions (off
topic)
Thread-index: AccYuQPSLwIrLya5T4ivem8lVU99aQ==
This question is slightly off topic, but I'll use R to try and make it
as relevant as possible. I'm working on a problem where I want to
compare estimates from a posterior distribution with a uniform prior
with those obtained from a frequentist approach. Under these conditions
the estimates should agree.
Specifically, I am asking the question, "What is the probability that
the true proportion of students passing a test is 50% when the observed
proportion for that school is only 38%?"
For my example, there are 100 students in the school and 38 of them
passed an exam. For conjugacy, if we choose a beta prior, then posterior
in this case is also a beta distribution. Now, I believe the a and b
parameters for a beta with a uniform prior is a=1 and b=1, or 1/(1+1)
Here is my R code for the posterior with a flat prior
n <- 100 # Total number of individuals
y <- 38 # Number of successes
a <- 1 # Parameter 1 for Beta prior
b <- 1 # Parameter 2 for Beta prior
theta <- .38 # Proportion passing
pbeta(.50, a + y, b+n-y, lower.tail=FALSE)
[1] 0.008253
Now, the binomial distribution gives
[1] 0.0040984
Obviously, the results don't agree. So, I'm wondering if I have
A) made a computational error
B) have an error in my assumption that the results should agree in this
case
Thanks for any reactions
Harold
Windows XP
_
platform i386-pc-mingw32
arch i386
os mingw32
system i386, mingw32
status
major 2
minor 4.0
year 2006
month 10
day 03
svn rev 39566
language R
version.string R version 2.4.0 (2006-10-03)
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]