-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: r-help-bounces at r-project.org
[mailto:r-help-bounces at r-project.org] Namens cct663
Verzonden: vrijdag 19 november 2010 5:39
Aan: r-help at r-project.org
Onderwerp: [R] Question on overdispersion
I have a few questions relating to overdispersion in a sex
ratio data set that I am working with (note that I already
have an analysis with GLMMs for fixed effects, this is just
to estimate dispersion). The response variable is binomial
because nestlings can only be male or female. I have samples of
1-5 nestlings from each nest (individuals within a nest are
not independent, so the response variable is the ratio of
sons to daughters) and some females have multiple nests in
the data set (so I need to include female identity as a
random effect).
Here is an example of what the three vectors used in the
model look like (the real data set is much bigger, just to
illustrate what I'm talking
about):
male_chick_no=c(2,4,1,0,3,5,2)
female_chick_no=c(1,0,3,3,1,0,2)
FemaleID=c(A,A,B,B,C,D,E)
My first question relates to coding the test in R. I received
this suggested R syntax from a reviewer:
SexRatio = cbind(male_chick_no, female_chick_no)
Model <- lmer(SexRatio ~ 1 +(1|FemaleID), family = quasibinomial)
But when I try to use this in R I get the error: "Error in
glmer(formula = ratio ~ 1 + (1 | femid), family =
quasibinomial) : "quasi" families cannot be used in glmer".
I've tried playing around with some other mixed model
functions but can't seem to find one that will provide an
estimate of dispersion and allow me to include my random effect.
Is there some other function I should be using? Or is there a
different syntax that I should use for lmer?
My second question is more general: I understand that with
binomial data overdispersion suggests that the observed data
have a greater variance than expected given binomial errors
(in my case this means that more nests would be all male/all
female than expected if sex is random). So with binomial
errors the expected estimate of dispersion is 1, if I find
that dispersion is > 1 it suggests that my data are
overdispersed. My question is, how much greater than 1 should
that number be to conclude that the data are overdispersed?
Is there a rule of thumb or does it just depend on the dataset?
I was thinking of doing a randomization test with the same
structure (nest size and female id) as my real data set but
with sex ratio of each nest randomized with a 50:50 chance of
individuals being sons or daughters and comparing my observed
dispersion to the distribution of dispersions from the
randomization test. Would this be a valid way to ask whether
my data are overdispersed? Is it even necessary?
Any help/advice that you can provide would be greatly
appreciated. I am relatively new to R so explicit
instructions (i.e. easy to follow) would be wonderful.
Thanks.
--
View this message in context:
http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Question-on-overdispersion-tp304
9898p3049898.html
Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.