R's documentation
Zheng, Xin (NIH) [C] wrote:
Sometimes I get confused with R's documentation. It seems the documents is not maintained and updated well. Anyone has similar feeling? I don't mean to offend anyone. I hope R would get better and better. But documentation is really one very important factor which could attract people coming or drive people away.
I absolutely agree. This is an area where novices as well as seasoned R users can give to the R project. If you find some documentation that is confusing, then you can write a message about it that states: 1) Precisely what you find confusing. 2) (optional but very helpful) A proposed rewrite of the passage that you think fixes the problem. Once you attempt step 2 a few times, you may come to appreciate the difficulty of writing good documentation. Help files are a particularly difficult medium -- they need to be clear (to novices, not just to the person who wrote the function), and they need to be short enough that people might read them. Patrick Burns patrick at burns-stat.com +44 (0)20 8525 0696 http://www.burns-stat.com (home of "The R Inferno" and "A Guide for the Unwilling S User")
Xin Zheng [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
______________________________________________ R-help at r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.