difference between max in summary table and max function
Dear all I have found out that the max in the summary of an integer vector is not always equal to the actual maximum of that vector. For example:
testrow <- c(1:131509) summary(testrow)
Min. 1st Qu. Median Mean 3rd Qu. Max.
1 32880 65760 65760 98630 131500
max(testrow)
[1] 131509 This has occurred both in a Windows and in a Linux environment. Does this mean that the max value in the summary is only an approximation? Best regards Laurent Franckx, PhD Senior researcher sustainable mobility VITO NV | Boeretang 200 | 2400 Mol Tel. ++ 32 14 33 58 22| mob. +32 479 25 59 07 | Skype: laurent.franckx | laurent.franckx at vito.be | Twitter @LaurentFranckx VITO Disclaimer: http://www.vito.be/e-maildisclaimer