Prev 322950 / 398502 Next

Why can't R understand if(num!=NA)?

David Winsemius

Fri, May 3, 2013 12:36 PM

On May 3, 2013, at 10:46 AM, peter dalgaard wrote:

Anything else would violate the Second Law of Thermodynamics. We cannot have comparisons reducing entropy, now can we? Uncertainty cannot run uphill.

David Winsemius
Alameda, CA, USA

Thread (15 messages)

John Why can't R understand if(num!=NA)? May 3 Leandro Marino Why can't R understand if(num!=NA)? May 3 David L Carlson Why can't R understand if(num!=NA)? May 3 S Ellison Why can't R understand if(num!=NA)? May 3 David Winsemius Why can't R understand if(num!=NA)? May 3 Marc Schwartz Why can't R understand if(num!=NA)? May 3 William Dunlap Why can't R understand if(num!=NA)? May 3 Kevin Wright Why can't R understand if(num!=NA)? May 3 Berend Hasselman Why can't R understand if(num!=NA)? May 3 arun Why can't R understand if(num!=NA)? May 3 Peter Dalgaard Why can't R understand if(num!=NA)? May 3 David Winsemius Why can't R understand if(num!=NA)? May 3 David Winsemius Why can't R understand if(num!=NA)? May 3 Peter Dalgaard Why can't R understand if(num!=NA)? May 3 David Winsemius Why can't R understand if(num!=NA)? May 4