[FORGED] Logical Operators' inconsistent Behavior
On 20/05/17 00:01, J?r?mie Juste wrote:
Hello,
Rolf said,
TRUE & FALSE is FALSE but TRUE & TRUE is TRUE, so TRUE & NA could be
either TRUE or FALSE and consequently is NA.
OTOH FALSE & (anything) is FALSE so FALSE & NA is FALSE.
According to this logic why is
FALSE & NA
[1] FALSE
Huh???? cheers, Rolf Turner
Technical Editor ANZJS Department of Statistics University of Auckland Phone: +64-9-373-7599 ext. 88276