How useful is iESS mode for emacs?
Agustin Lobo wrote:
(I reply to the Re: message because inadvertently I deleted the original) My opinion is that using the ESS interface for R is great for people who are used to emacs, and less good for the rest of people, because it is less intuitive than other editors (i.e., WinEdit). For me it was hard to get used to the (many) idiosynchratic details of emacs (a minor example, few people has a key labelled as META, but the M-... are everywhere in emacs). Also, I don't like the fact that if you, for example, make an ls() and then select and copy an object with the mouse and paste, you don't paste in the command line but on the list itself, unless you bring the cursor to the command line first. Very often I was not in the R command line and used to get (and still get sometimes) a message: "No command in this line". Also, at least in my setup, the begin key brings you on top of the ">" instead of on top of the first character after ">". Probably all these are minor problems (or perhaps, even advantages) for people who use emacs also for other purposes. Personally, I like better the Windows gui for R + WinEdit,
Thanks. But the editor is called *WinEdt* (without the "i"). WinEdit is another one, mostly known from the days of emtex (a LaTeX 2.09 distribution).
although I prefer linux for other reasons. The facility for printing and saving graphics from the graphic window is another very useful feature that I miss in linux.
Uwe Ligges -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe" (in the "body", not the subject !) To: r-help-request at stat.math.ethz.ch _._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._