add1 in glm
ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk wrote:
On Tue, 5 Nov 2002, Murray Jorgensen wrote:
I'm having a bit of difficulty using the stepwise model-building tools in a glm context. Here, for example is one problem I have had using add1, where the abbreviation "." does not work as I expected it to do. I
What did you expect? `.' means `what is already there' in updating a
formula, so you asked for nothing to be added. The help page says
scope: a formula giving the terms to be considered for adding or
dropping.
and that seems precise to me.
Well I based it on my interpretation of the beginning of the first example in the V&R discussion, also the first example in the stepAIC() page: data(quine) quine.hi <- aov(log(Days + 2.5) ~ .^4, quine) This seemed to suggest that "." meant "all the predictors". Now that I know what "." means, my error is clear. Does anyone know of functions for adding the best single term (or dropping the worst) from a specified scope? (Respecting marginality, of course!) Murray -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe" (in the "body", not the subject !) To: r-help-request at stat.math.ethz.ch _._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._