(NLS) correctly: NLM
On Fri, Nov 10, 2000 at 07:04:30AM +0000, Prof Brian D Ripley wrote:
Where, please? nls does not use it, as far as I know, but the optimizer nlm was supplemented/replaced by optim in version 0.99.0 so the referenced is outdated and we'd like to correct it if it is current.
Sorry, I now see that I put NLS in the subject instead of NLM. The Help that comes with major 1, minor 1.1 2000/August/15 i586-pc-linus-gnu says for NLM that "This is a preliminary version of this function and it will probably change." This is what I wanted to mean originally. Thanks, Zsombor -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe" (in the "body", not the subject !) To: r-help-request at stat.math.ethz.ch _._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._