help with the maxBHHH routine
maxBHHH is *not* an in-built R function. It is in a distributed package called "maxLik". Always tell us which package is being used so that it is easier for us to help you. The error message says that the gradient function is returning a 10 x 2 matrix, whereas you say that you have 1000's of observations and 821 parameters. Show us a simplified version of your problem. It is difficult to help you without seeing an example. Also, try running w/o the gradient and see how it works. This is not the answer you wanted, but we cannot help you w/o seeing your example. Ravi.
From: r-help-bounces at r-project.org [r-help-bounces at r-project.org] On Behalf Of Rohit Pandey [rohitpandey576 at gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2011 4:53 PM
To: r-help at r-project.org
Subject: [R] help with the maxBHHH routine
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2011 4:53 PM
To: r-help at r-project.org
Subject: [R] help with the maxBHHH routine
Hello R community,
I have been using R's inbuilt maximum likelihood functions, for the
different methods (NR, BFGS, etc).
I have figured out how to use all of them except the maxBHHH function. This
one is different from the others as it requires an observation level
gradient.
I am using the following syntax:
maxBHHH(logLik,grad=nuGradient,finalHessian="BHHH",start=prm,iterlim=2)
where logLik is the likelihood function and returns a vector of observation
level likelihoods and nuGradient is a function that returns a matrix with
each row corresponding to a single observation and the columns corresponding
to the gradient values for each parameter (as is mentioned in the online
help).
however, this gives me the following error:
*Error in checkBhhhGrad(g = gr, theta = theta, analytic = (!is.null(attr(f,
:
the matrix returned by the gradient function (argument 'grad') must have
at least as many rows as the number of parameters (10), where each row must
correspond to the gradients of the log-likelihood function of an individual
(independent) observation:
currently, there are (is) 10 parameter(s) but the gradient matrix has only
2 row(s)
*
It seems it is expecting as many rows as there are parameters. So, I changed
my likelihood function so that it would return the transpose of the earlier
matrix (hence returning a matrix with rows equaling parameters and columns,
observations).
However, when I run the function again, I still get an error:
*Error in gr[, fixed] <- NA : (subscript) logical subscript too long*
I have verified that my gradient function, when summed across observations
gives the same results as the in built numerical gradient (to the 11th
decimal place - after that, they differ since R's function is numerical).
I am trying to run a very large estimation (1000's of observations and 821
parameters) and all of the other methods are taking way too much time
(days). This method is our last hope and so, any help will be greatly
appreciated.
--
Thanks in advance,
Rohit
Mob: 91 9819926213
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
______________________________________________
R-help at r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.