how do I define a function which is equivalent to `deparse(substitute(x))`?
Thank you, John and David. Yes someone already came up with that one on Stack Overflow. Although I don't quite understand how it works - it would be nice to see a step-by-step explanation of what is getting substituted and evaluated in which environment. I guess 'eval.parent' must do its own substituting, just so that it can see the variables you pass to it, before it actually evaluates its argument. But 'eval' is .Internal... Maybe if this is less of a mystery to someone else ... Frederick
On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 02:54:14PM -0800, David Winsemius wrote:
...
Exactly the same answer as the crossposting elicited: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/41083293/in-r-how-do-i-define-a-function-which-is-equivalent-to-deparsesubstitutex -- David
On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 10:07:06PM +0000, Fox, John wrote:
Dear Frederick, I found this a challenging puzzle, and it took me awhile to come up with an alternative, and I think slightly simpler, solution:
desub <- function(y) {
+ deparse(eval(substitute(substitute(y)), + env=parent.frame())) + }
f <- function(x){
+ message(desub(x)) + }
f(log)
log Best, John ----------------------------- John Fox, Professor McMaster University Hamilton, Ontario Canada L8S 4M4 Web: socserv.mcmaster.ca/jfox
-----Original Message-----
From: R-help [mailto:r-help-bounces at r-project.org] On Behalf Of
frederik at ofb.net
Sent: December 11, 2016 8:35 PM
To: r-help at r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R] how do I define a function which is equivalent to
`deparse(substitute(x))`?
Dear R-Help,
I was going to ask Jeff to read the entire works of William Shakespeare to learn
why his reply was not helpful to me...
Then I realized that the answer, as always, lies within...
desub <- function(y) {
e1=substitute(y, environment())
e2=do.call(substitute,list(e1), env=parent.frame())
deparse(e2)
}
Sorry to trouble the list; other solutions still welcome.
Cheers,
Frederick
On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 12:46:23AM -0800, Jeff Newmiller wrote:
No. Read Hadley Wickham's "Advanced R" to learn why not. -- Sent from my phone. Please excuse my brevity. On December 10, 2016 10:24:49 PM PST, frederik at ofb.net wrote:
Dear R-Help, I asked this question on StackOverflow, http://stackoverflow.com/questions/41083293/in-r-how-do-i-define-a-fu nction-which-is-equivalent-to-deparsesubstitutex but thought perhaps R-help would be more appropriate. I want to write a function in R which grabs the name of a variable from the context of its caller's caller. I think the problem I have is best understood by asking how to compose `deparse` and `substitute`. You can see that a naive composition does not work: # a compose operator
> `%c%` = function(x,y)function(...)x(y(...))
# a naive attempt to combine deparse and substitute
> desub = deparse %c% substitute
> f=function(foo) { message(desub(foo)) }
> f(log)
foo # this is how it is supposed to work
> g=function(foo) { message(deparse(substitute(foo))) }
> g(log)
log Is there a way I can define a function `desub` so that `desub(x)` has the same value as `deparse(substitute(x))` in every context? Thank you, Frederick Eaton
______________________________________________ R-help at r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
______________________________________________ R-help at r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.