Improvement: function cut
Hello Andrew, But "cut" generates factors. In most cases with real data one expects to have also the ends of the interval: the argument "include.lowest" is both ugly and too long. [The test-code on the ftable thread contains this error! I have run through this error a couple of times.] The only real situation that I can imagine to be problematic: - if the interval goes to +Inf (or -Inf): I do not know if there would be any effects when including +Inf (or -Inf). Leonard
On 9/18/2021 1:14 AM, Andrew Simmons wrote:
While it is not explicitly mentioned anywhere in the documentation for .bincode, I suspect 'include.lowest = FALSE' is the default to keep the definitions of the bins consistent. For example: x <- 0:20 breaks1 <- seq.int <http://seq.int>(0, 16, 4) breaks2 <- seq.int <http://seq.int>(0, 20, 4) cbind( ? ? .bincode(x, breaks1, right = FALSE, include.lowest = TRUE), ? ? .bincode(x, breaks2, right = FALSE, include.lowest = TRUE) ) by having 'include.lowest = TRUE' with different ends, you can get inconsistent behaviour. While this probably wouldn't be an issue with 'real' data, this would seem like something you'd want to avoid by default. The definitions of the bins are [0, 4) [4, 8) [8, 12) [12, 16] and [0, 4) [4, 8) [8, 12) [12, 16) [16, 20] so you can see where the inconsistent behaviour comes from. You might be able to get R-core to add argument 'warn', but probably not to change the default of 'include.lowest'. I hope this helps On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 6:01 PM Leonard Mada <leo.mada at syonic.eu <mailto:leo.mada at syonic.eu>> wrote: Thank you Andrew. Is there any reason not to make: include.lowest = TRUE the default? Regarding the NA: The user still has to suspect that some values were not included and run that test. Leonard On 9/18/2021 12:53 AM, Andrew Simmons wrote:
Regarding your first point, argument 'include.lowest' already
handles this specific case, see ?.bincode
Your second point, maybe it could be helpful, but since both
'cut.default' and '.bincode' return NA if a value isn't within a
bin, you could make something like this on your own.
Might be worth pitching to R-bugs on the wishlist.
On Fri, Sep 17, 2021, 17:45 Leonard Mada via R-help
<r-help at r-project.org <mailto:r-help at r-project.org>> wrote:
Hello List members,
the following improvements would be useful for function cut
(and .bincode):
1.) Argument: Include extremes
extremes = TRUE
if(right == FALSE) {
??? # include also right for last interval;
} else {
??? # include also left for first interval;
}
2.) Argument: warn = TRUE
Warn if any values are not included in the intervals.
Motivation:
- reduce risk of errors when using function cut();
Sincerely,
Leonard
______________________________________________
R-help at r-project.org <mailto:R-help at r-project.org> mailing
list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
<https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help>
PLEASE do read the posting guide
http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
<http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html>
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible
code.