Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1111091138150.17032@salmo.appl-ecosys.com>
Date: 2011-11-09T19:39:54Z
From: Rich Shepard
Subject: Interpreting Multiple Linear Regression Summary
In-Reply-To: <CAHrK517rKMPT+VoBSzWp08kjD=NHjzN_7GWmsmd9Excv6KVrsw@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, 9 Nov 2011, John C Frain wrote:
> As far as I know if there is an NA in any variable in an observation the
> default is to drop the entire observation. Thus there are no observations
> in your calculation
John,
Hadn't realized that. I know there are NA's in other data frames that
yield model results. Perhaps it is the excessive numbers in this set that
are the problem.
Thanks,
Rich