Error in setwd(outDir) : cannot change working directory
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Joanna Papakonstantinou
<joanna.papa at gmail.com> wrote:
Below is what happened when I ran
testInstalledPackages(scope="base",errorsAreFatal=FALSE) Testing examples for package ?base? comparing ?base-Ex.Rout? to ?base-Ex.Rout.prev? ... files differ in number of lines: Testing examples for package ?tools? comparing ?tools-Ex.Rout? to ?tools-Ex.Rout.save? ... 474c474 < [1] "Matrix" "nlme" "vegan" "mgcv" --- > [1] "Matrix" "nlme" "mgcv" 619c619 < [1] "0cce1e42ef3fb133940946534fcf8896" --- > [1] "eb723b61539feef013de476e68b5c50a" 844c844 < [1] "R (>= 2.15.1)" --- > [1] "R (>= 2.14.0)" Running specific tests for package ?tools? Running ?undoc.R? Testing examples for package ?utils? comparing ?utils-Ex.Rout? to ?utils-Ex.Rout.prev? ... files differ in number of lines: Running specific tests for package ?utils? Running ?Sweave-tst.R? Warning: running command '"C:/PROGRA~1/R/R-215~1.2/bin/x64/R" CMD BATCH --vanilla --no-timing "Sweave-tst.R" "Sweave-tst.Rout" LANGUAGE=C' had status 1 Warning: testing 'utils' failed Testing examples for package ?grDevices? comparing ?grDevices-Ex.Rout? to ?grDevices-Ex.Rout.save? ... OK Running specific tests for package ?grDevices? Running ?ps-tests.R? comparing ?ps-tests.Rout? to ?ps-tests.Rout.save? ... OK Running ?xfig-tests.R? comparing ?xfig-tests.Rout? to ?xfig-tests.Rout.save? ... OK Testing examples for package ?graphics? comparing ?graphics-Ex.Rout? to ?graphics-Ex.Rout.save? ... OK Testing examples for package ?stats? comparing ?stats-Ex.Rout? to ?stats-Ex.Rout.save? ... OK Running specific tests for package ?stats? Running ?NLSstClosest.R? Running ?cmdscale.R? Running ?drop1-polr.R? Running ?ig_glm.R? Running ?ks-test.R? comparing ?ks-test.Rout? to ?ks-test.Rout.save? ... OK Running ?nafns.R? Running ?nls.R? comparing ?nls.Rout? to ?nls.Rout.save? ... OK Running ?offsets.R? Running ?ppr.R? Running ?simulate.R? comparing ?simulate.Rout? to ?simulate.Rout.save? ... OK Running ?smooth.spline.R? Running ?ts-tests.R? Testing examples for package ?datasets? comparing ?datasets-Ex.Rout? to ?datasets-Ex.Rout.save? ... OK Testing examples for package ?methods? comparing ?methods-Ex.Rout? to ?methods-Ex.Rout.prev? ... OK Running specific tests for package ?methods? Running ?S3.R? Running ?basicRefClass.R? Running ?duplicateClass.R? Running ?fieldAssignments.R? Running ?mixinInitialize.R? Running ?namesAndSlots.R? Running ?nextWithDots.R? Running ?refClassExample.R? Running ?testConditionalIs.R? Running ?testGroupGeneric.R? Running ?testIs.R? Testing examples for package ?grid? comparing ?grid-Ex.Rout? to ?grid-Ex.Rout.save? ... OK Running specific tests for package ?grid? Running ?bugs.R? Running ?reg.R? Running ?testls.R? comparing ?testls.Rout? to ?testls.Rout.save? ... OK Running ?units.R? Running vignettes for package ?grid? Testing examples for package ?splines? comparing ?splines-Ex.Rout? to ?splines-Ex.Rout.save? ... OK Testing examples for package ?stats4? comparing ?stats4-Ex.Rout? to ?stats4-Ex.Rout.save? ... OK Running specific tests for package ?stats4? Running ?confint.R? Testing examples for package ?tcltk? comparing ?tcltk-Ex.Rout? to ?tcltk-Ex.Rout.prev? ... OK Testing examples for package ?compiler? comparing ?compiler-Ex.Rout? to ?compiler-Ex.Rout.prev? ... OK Running specific tests for package ?compiler? Running ?assign.R? Running ?basics.R? Running ?const.R? Running ?envir.R? Running ?jit.R? Running ?loop.R? Running ?switch.R? Testing examples for package ?parallel? comparing ?parallel-Ex.Rout? to ?parallel-Ex.Rout.prev? ... OK Running specific tests for package ?parallel? Running ?Master.R? Running vignettes for package ?parallel?
I do not really know what any of this means but when I got a graph and no explicit errors returned I just wnet ahead with using the installation. I have not encountered anything wrong while using is so unless there is something you can tell from the above, I guess I will just continue to use the current installation. Many thanks. On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Gabor Grothendieck <ggrothendieck at gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 10:46 AM, Joanna Papakonstantinou <joanna.papa at gmail.com> wrote:
I only thought one was missing since it kept giving me error that it wasn't set. But all seems to working OK so I guess I don't need to create anything.
You can find out what at least some of these things mean by reading the help file. On your prior run the first two gave a response of 1 which, as the help file explains in the Value section, means they failed. On this one it seems the tests did not match the target because they were tested on a different version of R than the tests were prepared for. I suggest you just forget about these tests. I don't think there is anything wrong with your installation. By the way, the most recent version of R is R-2.15.2 and you might want to use that.
Statistics & Software Consulting GKX Group, GKX Associates Inc. tel: 1-877-GKX-GROUP email: ggrothendieck at gmail.com