Inf and lazy evaluation

The only place I know lazy evaluation really is visible and widely
used is in the passing of function arguments. It's what allows magic
like

zz <- 1:5
plot(zz)

to know your variable was called "zz." It can also show up in some
places through the promise mechanism, but you have to do a little bit
of work to see them:

zz <- lapply(1:3, function(i) function(x) x^i)

zz[[2]](2)

Without lazy evaluation this would have been 4. Sometimes this winds
up hurting folks -- I'm not sure if it has a "good reason" to be there
or if its a consequence of lazy mechanisms elsewhere (which improve
overall performance)

But I don't believe R allows lazy constructors in any context.

Best,
Michael

Thank you all for the replies.

On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 2:45 PM, R. Michael Weylandt
<michael.weylandt at gmail.com> wrote:

R is lazy, but not quite that lazy ;-)

Oh, what is this world coming to when you can't count on laziness to
be lazy. ;) ?I should probably stop reading about Haskell and their
lazy way of doing things.

As a relatively naive observation, in R, it seems like argument
recycling kind of breaks the power of lazy evaluation.

Thanks for the suggestion of list.files()


James