Skip to content
Prev 172896 / 398502 Next

Interaction term not significant when using glm???

On Fri, 6 Mar 2009, joris meys wrote:

            
The point estimate for the interaction term is large: 1.79, or an odds ratio of nearly 6.

The data are very strongly overdispersed (variance is 45 times larger than it should be), so they don't fit a binomial model well. If you used a quasibinomial model you would get no statistical significance for any of the terms.

I would say the problem is partly combination of the overdispersion and the sample size.  It doesn't help that the situation appears to be a difference between the FLC:yes cell and the other three cells, a difference that is spread out over the three parameters.

      -thomas
Thomas Lumley			Assoc. Professor, Biostatistics
tlumley at u.washington.edu	University of Washington, Seattle