Bug in arima?
It is backwards, but that doesn't seem to have caused the problem here.
On Wed, 30 Apr 2003, Rolf Turner wrote:
Is it just me being lysdexic or is the help file saying things backwards??? Brian Ripley wrote:
Here's a reproducible example (R 1.7.0)
set.seed(1)
x <- rnorm(100)
arima(x, order=c(7, 1, 0), fixed = c(NA, NA, NA, 0, 0, 0, NA),
transform.pars = FALSE)
Coefficients:
ar1 ar2 ar3 ar4 ar5 ar6 ar7
-0.6838 -0.4126 -0.2236 0 0 0 0.0454
s.e. 0.0986 0.1115 0.0988 0 0 0 0.0843
and you did not set transform.pars.
Looks like the comment
fixed: optional numeric vector of the same length as the total
number of parameters. If supplied, only non-`NA' entries in
`fixed' will be varied. `transform.pars = TRUE' will be
overridden if any AR parameters are fixed.
has been copied from help(arima0) and is unimplemented in arima.
Is it not the case that the parameters corresponding to ***NA*** entries in ``fixed'' are being ``varied'' (estimated) and those corresponding to ***non-NA*** values are indeed fixed --- at the given non-NA value? cheers, Rolf Turner rolf at math.unb.ca
______________________________________________ R-help at stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
Brian D. Ripley, ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk Professor of Applied Statistics, http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/ University of Oxford, Tel: +44 1865 272861 (self) 1 South Parks Road, +44 1865 272866 (PA) Oxford OX1 3TG, UK Fax: +44 1865 272595