R: Debian package and source
"David Andel" <andel at ifi.unizh.ch> writes:
Hi As Dirk said before, if you're running unstable, the official version is surely the best. If you're running testing though, you're probably better off using the apt sources listed in http://cran.us.r-project.org/bin/linux/debian/ReadMe since there are some dependency hassles with installing the unstable version on testing (at least I got tired of going through all the dependency stuff).
BTW, is there a good reason to keep the "testing" distribution at 1.6.0? I would assume that at least you'd want to include patches up to 1.6.2 rather than ship a version with known bugs. Not wanting to get into the 1.7.x series is understandable, of course.
O__ ---- Peter Dalgaard Blegdamsvej 3 c/ /'_ --- Dept. of Biostatistics 2200 Cph. N (*) \(*) -- University of Copenhagen Denmark Ph: (+45) 35327918 ~~~~~~~~~~ - (p.dalgaard at biostat.ku.dk) FAX: (+45) 35327907