lm and R-squared (newbie)

Hello,

I've two data.frames (data1 and data4), dec="." and sep=";".
http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/file/n4199964/data1.txt data1.txt
http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/file/n4199964/data4.txt data4.txt

When I do
plot(data1$nx,data1$ny, col="red")
points(data4$nx,data4$ny, col="blue")
,  results seem very similar (at least to me) but the R-squared of
summary(lm(data1$ny ~ data1$nx))
and
summary(lm(data4$ny ~ data4$nx))
are very different (0.48 against 0.89).

Could someone explain me the reason?
Because you failed to do an adequate assessment of your data. Try this  
ploting exercsie and I think you will see the reason for the  
differences:

plot(data1$nx,data1$ny, col="red", xlim=range(c(data1$nx,data4$nx)),  
ylim=range(c(data1$ny,data4$ny)) )
David.

>
> To be complete, I am looking for an simple indicator telling me if  
> it is
> worthwhile to keep the values provided by lm. I thought that R- 
> squared could
> do the job. For me, if R-squared is far from 1, the data are not  
> good enough
> to perform a linear fit.
> It seems that I'm wrong.
>
> Thanks for your explainations.
> Ptit Bleu.
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/lm-and-R-squared-newbie-tp4199964p4199964.html
> Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-help at r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

David Winsemius, MD
West Hartford, CT

lm and R-squared (newbie)

Thread (3 messages)