Skip to content
Prev 165274 / 398506 Next

NA, where no NA should (could!) be!

oliver 
Hello,


ok, I found the problem!



I now have:

    res_size_by_host <- tapply( selected$size, factor(selected$host), sum)


instead of

  
  res_size_by_host <- tapply( selected$size, selected$host, sum)


and now it works.

IMHO this is strange, because selected$host is already a factor!


I don't know, why this must be done...
...someone of the R-experts might know it...
...and may explain it...?!


Ciao,
   Oliver

Thread (14 messages)

oliver NA, where no NA should (could!) be! Dec 20 Sarah Goslee NA, where no NA should (could!) be! Dec 20 oliver NA, where no NA should (could!) be! Dec 20 Peter Dalgaard NA, where no NA should (could!) be! Dec 20 oliver NA, where no NA should (could!) be! Dec 20 oliver NA, where no NA should (could!) be! Dec 20 oliver NA, where no NA should (could!) be! Dec 20 David Winsemius NA, where no NA should (could!) be! Dec 20 Peter Dalgaard NA, where no NA should (could!) be! Dec 20 Dieter Menne NA, where no NA should (could!) be! Dec 21 Gabor Grothendieck NA, where no NA should (could!) be! Dec 21 Duncan Murdoch NA, where no NA should (could!) be! Dec 21 Gabor Grothendieck NA, where no NA should (could!) be! Dec 21 Wacek Kusnierczyk NA, where no NA should (could!) be! Dec 21