Michaelis-menten equation
"Chun-Ying Lee" <u9370004 at cc.kmu.edu.tw> writes:
Hi, We used known Vm and Km to simulate the data set (time, Cp) without adding random error in there. Yes, the line looks like very close to a straight line. But why can't we obtain the correct values with fitting process? We used optim first and then followed by using nls to fit the model. Thanks. regards,
Check your simulation. There is no way that curve is consistent with Km in the middle of the y range!
---Chun-ying Lee
Hmm, sorry, no. I'm talking through a hole in my head there. Vm*y/(Km+y) makes OK sense. Vm is what you get for large y - passing from 1st order to 0th order kinetics. However, looking at the data plot(PKindex) abline(lm(conc~time,data=PKindex)) shows that they are pretty much on a straight line, i.e. you are in the domain of 0-order kinetics. So why are you expecting the rate of decrease to have changed by roughly 3/4 (from 2/3*Vm/Vd at y=2*Km to 1/2*Vm/Vd at y=Km when you reach 4.67)??
______________________________________________ R-help at stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
O__ ---- Peter Dalgaard ??ster Farimagsgade 5, Entr.B c/ /'_ --- Dept. of Biostatistics PO Box 2099, 1014 Cph. K (*) \(*) -- University of Copenhagen Denmark Ph: (+45) 35327918 ~~~~~~~~~~ - (p.dalgaard at biostat.ku.dk) FAX: (+45) 35327907