vector manipulations
No problems with it working. The main problem I have observed is unrealistic expectations. People write an *essentially* non-vectorized function and expect Vectorize to produce a version of it which will out-perform explicit loops every time. No magic bullets in this game. Bill. Bill Venables CSIRO Laboratories PO Box 120, Cleveland, 4163 AUSTRALIA Office Phone (email preferred): +61 7 3826 7251 Fax (if absolutely necessary): +61 7 3826 7304 Mobile: +61 4 8819 4402 Home Phone: +61 7 3286 7700 mailto:Bill.Venables at csiro.au http://www.cmis.csiro.au/bill.venables/ -----Original Message----- From: Duncan Murdoch [mailto:murdoch at stats.uwo.ca] Sent: Wednesday, 5 March 2008 9:36 AM To: Venables, Bill (CMIS, Cleveland) Cc: r-help at r-project.org Subject: Re: [R] vector manipulations
On 3/4/2008 5:41 PM, Bill.Venables at csiro.au wrote:
Your problem is that your function log1( , ) is not vectorized with respect to its arguments. For a function to work in outer(...) it
must
accept vectors for its first two arguments and it must produce a parallel vector of responses. To quote the help information for outer: "FUN is called with these two extended vectors as arguments.
Therefore,
it must be a vectorized function (or the name of one), expecting at least two arguments." Sometimes Vectorize can be used to make a non-vectorized function into
a
vectorized one, but the results are not always entirely satisfactory
in
my experience.
What problems have you seen? Duncan Murdoch