Message-ID: <4D2D004C.3040201@ucalgary.ca>
Date: 2011-01-12T01:13:48Z
From: Peter Ehlers
Subject: aggregate.formula implicitly removes rows containing NA
In-Reply-To: <3807574F-51A7-4170-BD5D-559B6B26A1BA@carnegielearning.com>
On 2011-01-11 14:41, Dickison, Daniel wrote:
> The documentation for `aggregate` makes it sound like aggregate.formula should behave identically to aggregate.data.frame (apart from the way the parameters are passed). But it looks like aggregate.formula is quietly removing rows where any of the "output" variables (those on the LHS of the formula) are NA. This differs from how aggregate.data.frame works. Is this expected behavior?
>
> Here are a couple of examples:
>
>> d<- data.frame(a=rep(1:2, each=2),
> + b=c(1,2,NA,3))
>> aggregate(d["b"], d["a"], mean)
> a b
> 1 1 1.5
> 2 2 NA
>> aggregate(b ~ a, d, mean)
> a b
> 1 1 1.5
> 2 2 3.0
>
> It's removing whole rows even if just one of the columns is NA, i.e.:
>
>> d<- data.frame(a=rep(1:2, each=2),
> + b=c(1,2,NA,3),
> + c=c(NA,2,3,NA))
>> aggregate(cbind(b,c) ~ a, d, mean)
> a b c
> 1 1 2 2
>
> Daniel
Try setting na.acton = na.pass.
Peter Ehlers