correct wording and notation for R stuff in LaTex

If you are free to format your references to packages and functions as you
please, you might follow the convention used by the Journal of Statistical
Software.

you can do this by adding the following to your latex file:

\newcommand{\pkg}[1]{{\normalfont\fontseries{b}\selectfont #1}}
\let\proglang=\textsf
\let\code=\texttt

then you can refer to R as \proglang{R}, to packages with e.g.,
\pkg{packagename} and to functions/other code as \code{functionname}.

Hi R Gurus:

I'm putting together an article about some R stuff in Latex.

I refer to packages and functions.

I think that I use {\em} for packages and {\tt} for functions.

Is that correct, please?

Thank you in advance!
Sincerely,
Edna Bell

______________________________________________
R-help at r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.