efficiency and "forcing" questions
"db" == david beede <david.beede at mail.doc.gov> writes:
db> B. I say "seems" because after running the program for an
db> hour, I type ctl-G to quit. The *R* session seemed to be
db> terminated, with about 40 or so groups processed, so I opened
db> up another R session to try to see what had happened. After I
db> quit the second session, suddenly the first session seemed to
db> come back to life and spit out the printed output for the rest
db> of the groups! So I wonder if there is something I need to
db> add to my program to "force" it to finish processing? (I
db> apologize for the inarticulate way I am posing this question!)
This delay "might" be due to problems with Emacs.
(reason for cc'ing r-help) Is there anything comparable to "top" on
unix, for windows, so that you can track process status?
best,
-tony
A.J. Rossini Rsrch. Asst. Prof. of Biostatistics UW Biostat/Center for AIDS Research rossini at u.washington.edu FHCRC/SCHARP/HIV Vaccine Trials Net rossini at scharp.org -------- (friday is unknown) -------- FHCRC: M--W : 206-667-7025 (fax=4812)|Voicemail is pretty sketchy CFAR: ?? : 206-731-3647 (fax=3694)|Email is far better than phone UW: Th : 206-543-1044 (fax=3286)|Change last 4 digits of phone to FAX -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe" (in the "body", not the subject !) To: r-help-request at stat.math.ethz.ch _._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._