Message-ID: <1323956141013-4199964.post@n4.nabble.com>
Date: 2011-12-15T13:35:41Z
From: PtitBleu
Subject: lm and R-squared (newbie)
Hello,
I've two data.frames (data1 and data4), dec="." and sep=";".
http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/file/n4199964/data1.txt data1.txt
http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/file/n4199964/data4.txt data4.txt
When I do
plot(data1$nx,data1$ny, col="red")
points(data4$nx,data4$ny, col="blue")
, results seem very similar (at least to me) but the R-squared of
summary(lm(data1$ny ~ data1$nx))
and
summary(lm(data4$ny ~ data4$nx))
are very different (0.48 against 0.89).
Could someone explain me the reason?
To be complete, I am looking for an simple indicator telling me if it is
worthwhile to keep the values provided by lm. I thought that R-squared could
do the job. For me, if R-squared is far from 1, the data are not good enough
to perform a linear fit.
It seems that I'm wrong.
Thanks for your explainations.
Ptit Bleu.
--
View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/lm-and-R-squared-newbie-tp4199964p4199964.html
Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.