Understanding eval
On 22/12/2007 3:30 PM, Charilaos Skiadas wrote:
After many hours of debugging code, I came to the conclusion that I
have a fundamental misunderstanding regarding eval, and hope that
someone here can explain to me, why the following code acts as it does:
foo <- function(expr) {
eval(substitute(expr), envir=list(a=5), enclos=parent.frame())
}
bar <- function(er) {
foo(er)
}
> foo(a)
[1] 5
> bar(a)
Error in eval(expr, envir, enclos) : object "a" not found Now, regarding the "bar(a)" call, this is my understanding of what happens, hoping someone will correct me where I'm wrong. 1) bar is called. Its evaluation frame contains the association "er=a". 2) bar calls foo. So foo is called, and its evaluation frame contains the association "expr=er", with enclosing environment the local environment of bar. 3) foo calls eval. 4) eval starts by evaluating "substitute(expr)" in foo's environment. "substitute" then locates expr in foo's environment, and replaces it with er. So the result of this process is the symbol er, which is what will now be evaluated by eval. 5) eval then creates the environment where this evaluation will take place. It does that by creating an environment containing the frame "a=5", and with enclosing environment the parent frame of foo, which is bar's environment. 6) So, as I understand it, the symbol "er" is going to now be evaluated in an environment where a is set to 5 and er is set to a, along with whatever is in the user's workspace.
I think this part is wrong. A better description is: er is going to be evaluated in an environment where a is set to 5. The parent of that environment is the bar evaluation frame, where er is set to be a promise to evaluate a in the global environment.
7) So the first step now is looking up a definition for er. Nothing is found in the current frame, so the evaluation proceeds to bar's environment, where the association "er=a" is found, so er is replaced by a.
No, at this point an attempt is made to force the promise. Promises have their own associated environments, and that's where the evaluation takes place. In the case of the er object, the associated environment is the one where bar(a) was called, i.e. the global environment.
8) Now, and perhaps this is where I misunderstand things, the lookup for a will take place. My thinking was that the lookup would start from the evaluation environment that eval created, and hence would locate the a=5 value. But this is clearly not what happens. Anyway, hope someone will correct me where I'm wrong, and explain to me what I am doing wrong, and ideally how to diagnose such things.
Diagnosing things like this is hard. Promises are very difficult things to look at: as soon as you try to do anything with them they get evaluated, and there's no way in R code to display them without that. You can use substitute() to extract the expression part, but there's no way to extract the environment part. Maybe there should be, but it's tricky to get the semantics right. If the function environment() worked to extract the environment of a promise, then all sorts of code would fail where I really wanted to evaluate the arg before extracting the environment. Duncan Murdoch