dplyr and function length()

On 04 Aug 2015, at 10:50 , Karl Schilling <karl.schilling at uni-bonn.de>
wrote:

Dear All,

I have an observation / question about how the function length()

works once package dplyr is loaded.

Say we have a data.frame  df with n rows and m columns. Then a way to

get the number of rows is to use

length(df$m1)  (m1 here stand is as the header of the first column)

or, alternatively

length(df[,1]).

Both commands will return n.

However, once dplyr is loaded,

length(df[,1]) will return a value of 1.

length(df$m1) and also length(df[[1]]) will correctly return n.

I know that using length() may not be the most elegant or efficient

way to get the value of n. However, what puzzles (and somewhat
disturbs) me is that loading of dplyr affects how length() works,
without there being a warning or masking message upon loading it.

Any clarification or comment would be welcome.

Presumably, dplyr changes how [.data.frame works (by altering the
default for drop=, I expect) so that df[,1] is a data frame with 1
variable and not a vector. And yes, that _is_ somewhat disturbing.

-pd 

Thank you so much,

Karl


-- 
Karl Schilling