Skip to content
Prev 22367 / 398502 Next

Pseudo R^2 for logit - really naive question

On Sun, 4 Aug 2002 11:23:34 -0500
Chris Lawrence <cnlawren at phy.olemiss.edu> wrote:

            
Chris - That's a really nice paper.  I hadn't realized that the index in Nagelkerke's 1991 Biometrika paper was first proposed by Cragg and Uhler in 1970.
Percent correctly predicted has a host of problems, only some of which were pointed out in the above article.  This is an improper scoring rule (is not optimized when predicted probabilities are correct and its value can decrease when an important regressor is added to a model; see also http://hesweb1.med.virginia.edu/biostat/presentations/probclin.pdf).  The paper also did not reference the large literature on scoring rules for dichotomous outcomes (see e.g. work by Habbema and Hilden in the medical diagnostic literature and many papers on the Brier score and its decompositions).

Frank Harrell