other way of making a table?
Yepp, i do not necessarily know them beforehand. Or maybe i should rather say that they may differ from time to time but i want to be able to just copy the code. I can use your code that skips the first factor commands though, thanks.
On 09.10.2012, at 15:00, Jeff Newmiller wrote:
Use factors?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jeff Newmiller The ..... ..... Go Live...
DCN:<jdnewmil at dcn.davis.ca.us> Basics: ##.#. ##.#. Live Go...
Live: OO#.. Dead: OO#.. Playing
Research Engineer (Solar/Batteries O.O#. #.O#. with
/Software/Embedded Controllers) .OO#. .OO#. rocks...1k
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sent from my phone. Please excuse my brevity.
Jessica Streicher <j.streicher at micromata.de> wrote:
I'm making tables for prediction results of classifiers (2 classes) that show the usual numbers, true positives, false positives, etc I used the command table(predictedLabels,realLabels) to make those. I just had a case though ,where one of the label vectors had only one class in it. This will result in only half a table. Compare: x<-c(1,1,1,0,0) y<-c(1,1,1,0,1) table(x,y) to x<-c(1,1,1,0,0) y<-c(1,1,1,1,1) table(x,y) I want the second one to still have all 4 cases (second column all zeros then). Any easy solutions?
______________________________________________ R-help at r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.