Using the pipe, |>, syntax with "names<-"
Thanks, Calum. That was exactly what Duncan Murdoch proposed earlier in this thread, except, of course, he had to explicitly write the function first. -- Bert
On Sun, Jul 21, 2024 at 8:12?AM CALUM POLWART <polc1410 at gmail.com> wrote:
The tidy solution is rename literally: z |> rename(foo = 2) Or you could do it with other functions z |> select ( 1, foo = 2) Or z |> mutate( foo = 2 ) |> # untested (always worry that makes the whole column 2) select (-2) But that's akin to z$foo <- z[2] z[2] <- null On Sun, 21 Jul 2024, 16:01 Bert Gunter, <bgunter.4567 at gmail.com> wrote:
Wow! Yes, this is very clever -- way too clever for me -- and meets my criteria for a solution. I think it's also another piece of evidence of why piping in base R is not suited for complex/nested assignments, as discussed in Deepayan's response. Maybe someone could offer a better Tidydata piping solution just for completeness? Best, Bert On Sun, Jul 21, 2024 at 7:48?AM Gabor Grothendieck <ggrothendieck at gmail.com> wrote:
This - is non-destructive (does not change z) - passes the renamed z onto further pipe legs - does not use \(x)... It works by boxing z, operating on the boxed version and then unboxing it. z <- data.frame(a = 1:3, b = letters[1:3]) z |> list(x = _) |> within(names(x)[2] <- "foo") |> _$x ## a foo ## 1 1 a ## 2 2 b ## 3 3 c On Sat, Jul 20, 2024 at 4:07?PM Bert Gunter <bgunter.4567 at gmail.com> wrote:
This post is likely pretty useless; it is motivated by a recent post from "Val" that was elegantly answered using Tidyverse constructs, but I wondered how to do it using base R only. Along the way, I ran into the following question to which I think my answer (below) is pretty awful. I would be interested in more elegant base R approaches. So... z <- data.frame(a = 1:3, b = letters[1:3])
z
a h 1 1 a 2 2 b 3 3 c Suppose I want to change the name of the second column of z from 'b' to 'foo' . This is very easy using nested function syntax by: names(z)[2] <- "foo"
z
a foo 1 1 a 2 2 b 3 3 c Now suppose I wanted to do this using |> syntax, along the lines of: z |> names()[2] <- "foo" ## throws an error Slightly fancier is: z |> (\(x)names(x)[2] <- "b")() ## does nothing, but does not throw an error. However, the following, which resulted from a more careful read of ?names works (after changing the name of the second column back to "b" of course): z |>(\(x) "names<-"(x,value = "[<-"(names(x),2,'foo')))()
z
a foo 1 1 a 2 2 b 3 3 c This qualifies to me as "pretty awful." I'm sure there are better ways to do this using pipe syntax, so I would appreciate any better approaches. Best, Bert
______________________________________________ R-help at r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
-- Statistics & Software Consulting GKX Group, GKX Associates Inc. tel: 1-877-GKX-GROUP email: ggrothendieck at gmail.com
______________________________________________ R-help at r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.