Parameters setting in functions optimization
optimx does allow you to use bounds. The default is using only methods from optim(), but even though I had a large hand in those methods, and they work quite well, there are other tools available within optimx that should be more appropriate for your problem. For example, the current version of optimx should work quite well with lower and upper bounds specified, and you can see which methods work well by putting control=list(all.methods=TRUE). all.methods would be overkill for general use of course. I am hoping to have a new version of optimx up on R-forge within a week -- there are so many options to check -- that traps the NaNs etc. if it can, and also allows parameter and function scaling as well as several other new features. This is all experimental at the moment, but initial results are promising. This is less about "better methods" than about trapping errors and bad scaling etc. However, if you are able to share your script and data, I'll be happy to use it as a test and report back to you if you can communicate it to me off-list. Best, JN
On 11/30/2011 06:00 AM, r-help-request at r-project.org wrote:
Message: 68
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 19:15:43 +0100
From: Diane Bailleul <diane.bailleul at u-psud.fr>
To: r-help at r-project.org
Subject: [R] Parameters setting in functions optimization
Message-ID: <4ED5214F.7030504 at u-psud.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Good afternoon everybody,
I'm quite new in functions optimization on R and, whereas I've read
lot's of function descriptions, I'm not sure of the correct settings for
function like "optimx" and "nlminb".
I'd like to minimize my parameters and the loglikelihood result of the
function.
My parameters are a mean distance of dispersion and a proportion of
individuals not assigned, coming from very far away.
The function LikeGi reads external tables and it's working as I want
(I've got a similar model on Mathematica).
My "final" function is LogLiketot :
LogLiketot<- function(dist,ms)
{
res <- NULL
for(i in 1:nrow(pop5)){
for(l in 1:nrow(freqvar)){
res <- c(res, pop5[i,l]*log(LikeGi(l,i,dist,ms)))
}
}
return(-sum(res))
}
dist is the mean dispersal distance (0, lots of meters) and ms the
proportion of individuals (0-1).
Of course, I want them to be as low as possible.
I'd tried to enter the initials parameters as indicated in the tutorials :
optim(c(40,0.5), fn=LogLiketot)
>Error in 1 - ms : 'ms' is missing
But ms is 0.5 ...
So I've tried this form :
optimx(c(30,50),ms=c(0.4,0.5), fn=LogLiketot)
with different values for the two parameters :
par fvalues method fns grs itns conv KKT1
KKT2 xtimes
>2 19.27583, 25.37964 2249.698 BFGS 12 8 NULL 0 TRUE
TRUE 57.5
>1 29.6787861, 0.1580298 2248.972 Nelder-Mead 51 NA NULL 0 TRUE
TRUE 66.3
The first line is not possible but as I've not constrained the
optimization ... but the second line would be a very good result !
Then, searching for another similar cases, I've tried to change my
function form:
LogLiketot<- function(par)
{
res <- NULL
for(i in 1:nrow(pop5)){
for(l in 1:nrow(freqvar)){
res <- c(res, pop5[i,l]*log(LikeGi(l,i,par[1],par[2])))
}
}
return(-sum(res))
}
where dist=par[1] and ms=par[2]
And I've got :
optimx(c(40,0.5), fn=LogLiketot)
par fvalues method fns grs itns conv KKT1
KKT2 xtimes
>2 39.9969607, 0.9777634 1064.083 BFGS 29 10 NULL 0 TRUE
NA 92.03
>1 39.7372199, 0.9778101 1064.083 Nelder-Mead 53 NA NULL 0 TRUE
NA 70.83 And I've got now a warning message :
>In log(LikeGi(l, i, par[1], par[2])) : NaNs produced
(which are very bad results in that case) Anyone with previous experiences in optimization of several parameters could indicate me the right way to enter the initial parameters in this kind of functions ? Thanks a lot for helping me ! Diane -- Diane Bailleul Doctorante Universit? Paris-Sud 11 - Facult? des Sciences d'Orsay Unit? Ecologie, Syst?matique et Evolution D?partement Biodiversit?, Syst?matique et Evolution UMR 8079 - UPS CNRS AgroParisTech Porte 320, premier ?tage, B?timent 360 91405 ORSAY CEDEX FRANCE (0033) 01.69.15.56.64